• Zafar Iqbal Bhatti1, Sadia Asif2, Anila Akbar3, Nazia Ismail4, Kulsoom Najam5


The abstract of the papers fulfills the 5 essential conditions to help the reader to know what the study is all about, firstly the purpose of the study which is to examine the impact of peer scaffolding through process approach. Secondly, the sources from where the data are elicited, it is from 49 EFL learners studying at university. Thirdly, the method which is, according to the researches that participants were randomly assigned to two groups, one the control group and the other experimental group. Fourthly, the general results, after using SPSS 16, enhancement as words per minute average words in some basic areas of writing fluency, , has been pointed out. The researches applied process approach to present the improvement of this peer scaffolding technique on the academic writing of the learners of English as a foreign language. The future implications can definitely bring drastic changes in the domain of EFL. The researchers also mentioned the key terms of this research study.

These five pieces of information from the abstract provides the basic concept of this study and an interesting aspect of EFL by employing a peer scaffolding technique. (Kessler’s Bourassa, 2001), which focused at the point of whether peer scaffolding has any effect on academic writing fluency, through process approach. This abstract analysis can be summarized for better understanding.


Barnard, R. (2002). Peer tutoring in the primary classroom: A sociocultural interpretation of classroom interaction. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 37(1), 52-72.
Barnard, R & Campbell, L. (2005). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of the process writing: The scaffolding of learning in a university context. The TESOLANZ journal 13, 76-88.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In: J.P. Lantolf & G., Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second research. Norwood, NJ: Albex.
Fred, Perry, Jr. (2006). Research in Applied Linguistics. Becoming a discerning consumer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, New jersey
Gay, L.R., & Airasian, P. (2000). Evaluation of a research report. In Educational research: competencies for analysis and application (pp. 571-590). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice-Hall. (Education Library – Stacks LB1028 .G38 2000)
Hekamaki, L. (2005). Scaffolding assistance provided by EFL teacher during whole class interaction. Unpublished PhD thesis.
University of Jyvaskyala, Jyvaskyala.
Iedema, R.(2003a). Discourses of post bureaucratic organization. Amesterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lantolf, J.P. & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B.V. Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), theories in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riazi, M. & Rezaii, M. (2010). Teacher-and peer scaffolding behaviours: Effects on EFL students’ writing improvement. In A. Feryok (Ed.) CLESOL 2010: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference for Community Language and ESOL.
Storch, N. (1999). Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27, 363-347.
How to Cite
Zafar Iqbal Bhatti1, Sadia Asif2, Anila Akbar3, Nazia Ismail4, Kulsoom Najam5. (2020). THE IMPACT OF PEER SCAFFOLDING THROUGH PROCESS APPROACH ON EFL LEARNERS’ ACADEMIC WRITING FLUENCY. Epistemology, 7(1), 102-110. Retrieved from