“CALL ME MALCOLM” A TRUE DESIGN OF LOOKING GLASS SELF-THEORY IN WESTERN CULTURE

  • Nadia Anjum1, Dr. Mustanir Ahmed2, Zarmeena Khan3, Anila Akbar4, Kulsoom Najam5
Keywords: Malcolm, society, Western, call, transgender, struggle.

Abstract

This research paper is an attempt to explore difficulties of the transgendered people as portrayed in the Holly wood documentary “Call Me Malcolm” with special reference to the Charles Horton Cooley’s looking glass self-theory. The direction and Production are given by Joseph Parlagreco in 2004 and released in March, 2007 in USA. The communal behavior with transgendered people, due to their gender identity is highlighted in Western society. The “role of society” is the major component of looking glass design that creates pessimistic environment in the life of Malcolm, who suffers a lot in life. Various aspects of the theory   are carefully chosen to observe the height of difficulties faced by transgender people in the selected documentary and are analyzed within the framework of Qualitative methodology. Transgender are poorly treated as it is portrayed in the context of western society. They are not accepted in the society. To elucidate the problems of transgender, discriminatory behaviors adopted by the society due to odd physical condition towards Malcolm (a transgender child), on other transgender community and audience is discussed in this paper. By analyzing the dialogues from original text call me Malcolm it is concluded that Malcolm is struggling for existence; He fights and ultimately able to survive Although his culture and ethics are strong, but struggle for survival was a perplexing task to bridge the gap between transgender and a common man in the western world.  

References

Call Me Malcolm: A documentary film. (2004). The United Church of Christ and Film works, Inc. Yeung, King-To, and Martin, John Levi. "The Looking Glass Self: An Empirical Test and Elaboration." Social Forces 81, no. 3 (2003): 843–879.
Whittle S, Turner L.E, & Alami.M, (Feb 2007) The equalities review Engendered Penalties: Transgender and Transsexual people’s Expression of inequality and discrimination, (pp.6-92) Manchester Metropolitan University, Press for chang,BM Network,London,WCIN www.the equalities review.org.uk.
Doctor, F. F. & Flemming, J. S. (1992). ‘Dimensions of Transvestism and Transexualism: The Validation and factorial structure of the Cross Gender Questionnaire’. In Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality.
Rahim. A .E, (2010). Vol 10,No1 Marginalized through the “Looking Glass Self” The development of stereotypes and labeling:college of M & Tech Walden Uni Minneapolis, MN USA. Rev, Mike Schuenemeyer, discussion Guide, Riverside International Film Festi
Rev, Mike Schuenemeyer, discussion Guide, Riverside International Film Festival, Cleveland International Film Festival Wingspan Film Festival, Frame line 29, San Fransisco,Mix Mexico Film Festival. (Rev, Amos Lassen “Call Me Malcolm”–making peace with oneself)
Benjamin. H. (2001). What Transexuality Is: The Standards of Care for Gender Identity Disorder
Michael. D. M. & Avision, D. E. (2009). Qualitative Research in InformatioSystems. Edited by SAGE Publications Ltd, 6th Bonhill street London EC2A 4PU.
Whittle .S,(2010.June 2nd).A brief history of transgender issues: Change, The guardian news, winner of the Pulitzer prize,UK
Valentine.G & McDonald.I(2004,November) Understanding prejudice attitudes towards minorities,Stone wall community fund UK.wwwstonewall.org.uk(pp.8-22)
Yeung, King-To, and Martin, John Levi. "The Looking Glass Self: An Empirical Test and Elaboration." Social Forces 81, no. 3 (2003): 843–879.
Published
2020-10-07